How ElevateOS gave Wonderchef an 8× ROAS turnaround

Whilter.AI fixed the leaky funnel on the bleeding product lines — SKUs stuck below 1× ROAS came back at 2.5–3.1× in 90 days.

The impact
+166% Link CTR uplift across matched experiments
61.8× Twister ROAS jump: 0.05× → 3.09×
10.3× Remarketing CTR jump: 0.86% → 8.90%
₹29.7L Revenue from Elevate creatives in 90 days
Click-through rate — before vs after
0.47% 1.49%
Twister 3.2×
0.32% 1.93%
Chai Magic 6.0×
1.08% 2.84%
Chef Magic 2.6×
0.86% 8.9%
Remarketing 10×
Before After

Link CTR on matched head-to-head experiments; growth multiple shown per SKU.

Return on ad spend — before vs after
0.05× 3.09×
Twister 62×
0.54× 2.47×
Chai Magic 4.6×
4.33× 3.75×
Chef Magic 0.9×
4.4× 5.51×
Remarketing 1.3×
Before After

Purchase ROAS; loss-making SKUs returned to 2.5–3.1× and remarketing compounded.

Product experimentROAS beforeROAS afterCTR beforeCTR afterGrowth
Twister0.05×3.09×0.47%1.49%61.8× ROAS · 3.2× CTR
Chai Magic0.54×2.47×0.32%1.93%4.6× ROAS · 6.0× CTR
Chef Magic4.33×3.75×1.08%2.84%2.6× CTR lift
Remarketing (ATC)4.40×5.51×0.86%8.90%1.3× ROAS · 10.3× CTR

* Matched head-to-head experiments — before/after measured on the same product line and audience, over the same window.

The challenge Media budget was ready. Creative supply wasn't.

Wonderchef is a leading D2C kitchen-appliances and cookware brand from Sanjeev Kapoor. In a creative-led category, growth was gated by how fast winning creatives could be produced, tested and scaled.

Six symptoms compounded into falling returns:

  • Limited production bandwidth. A lean creative team couldn't keep pace with the volume of concepts performance marketing needed.
  • Slow turnaround. Long lead times delayed launches and let demand windows pass.
  • Testing couldn't scale. Too few variants starved Meta of fresh signals.
  • Creative fatigue eroded ROAS. Over-served audiences drove falling CTR and rising costs.
  • Loss-making SKUs. Twister and Chai Magic were running below 1.0× ROAS.
  • Weak BOFU supply. Remarketing lacked enough conversion-grade creative.
How Whilter approached it

A creative-to-conversion loop.

ElevateOS ran a closed-loop creative-to-conversion system — generating brand-safe variants at sprint cadence, mapping them to bottom-of-funnel audiences, and testing every asset head-to-head against the incumbent control before a rupee of budget scaled behind a winner.

a · Strategy

Data before playbook

Every creative was judged on one thing — whether it produced profitable BOFU purchases — not on opinion or awareness proxies.

b · Solution

Five moves, one system

Generate, target, test, scale, refresh — sequenced like a performance engine so winners compounded and waste was retired fast.

c · Tech

AI removed the ceiling

Multiple hooks, formats and angles per SKU in a single cycle — creative supply finally matched media ambition and testing needs.

d · Execution

Experiment-led scaling

Every Elevate asset launched against the incumbent control for the same product and audience; budget only followed proven lift.

  1. 1

    Generate at scale

    ElevateOS produced multiple hooks, formats and messaging angles per SKU in a single cycle.

  2. 2

    Target BOFU audiences

    Variants were mapped to remarketing pools, add-to-cart users, interactors, and conversion lookalikes.

  3. 3

    Test head-to-head

    Every Elevate asset launched against the incumbent control for the same product and audience.

  4. 4

    Scale winners, retire waste

    Winners scaled on CTR, ROAS and conversion rate; underperformers were retired quickly.

  5. 5

    Refresh continuously

    Fatigued creative was replaced before it could drain ROAS.

The weapon

The creative that did the work — a few of the assets Whilter shipped into the account.

Why it worked

Creative was the real bottleneck

Spend was never the constraint — once creative supply scaled, the same budget produced more profitable purchases.

Intent-matched messaging

BOFU creatives spoke to high-intent buyers instead of recycling awareness hooks.

Proof before budget

Every scale-up followed a head-to-head win, so gains compounded instead of regressing.

Fresh signals for Meta

A constant stream of new variants kept the algorithm learning and CTR climbing on every experiment.

The compounding insight creative supply stopped bottlenecking spend. Click-through rose on every experiment, loss-making SKUs returned to 2.5–3.1× ROAS, and Wonderchef could scale bottom-of-funnel budget against proven creative.

“Whilter Elevate didn't just give us more creative — it gave us a system. We went from waiting on assets to testing winners every week, and the SKUs we'd almost given up on are profitable again. It felt like adding an always-on growth team to our performance engine.”

Amit Phutane CBO, Wonderchef

Want results like these for your brand?

Snapshot
Industry
Retail & D2C · FMCG
Company size
Mid-Market · Enterprise
Channel
Meta · Paid Social
Region
India
Use case
BOFU Creative Optimization
Engine
ElevateOS
Methodology & notes

Figures derive from Wonderchef's Meta Ads campaign export. "After" = campaigns built with Whilter Elevate, identified by Whilter / experiment tags launched during the 90-day engagement; "before" = incumbent BOFU performance creatives for the same product line and audience. ROAS = purchase conversion value ÷ amount spent; CTR = link clicks ÷ impressions. The headline "8× ROAS turnaround" is the blended purchase-ROAS recovery across the loss-making SKUs — from ≈0.3× to ≈2.8× across Twister and Chai Magic, stated conservatively. Blended cohort figures are spend- and impression-weighted across Elevate campaigns: ₹8.46L spend, ₹29.7L revenue, and 1,256 purchases.

Wonderchef — frequently asked questions

What results did Whilter deliver for Wonderchef?

+166% CTR · 8× ROAS turnaround. Delivered with ElevateOS. See the full breakdown above.

How were these results measured?

Figures derive from Wonderchef's Meta Ads campaign export. "After" = campaigns built with Whilter Elevate, identified by Whilter / experiment tags launched during the 90-day engagement; "before" = incumbent BOFU performance creatives for the same product line and audience. ROAS = purchase conversion value ÷ amount spent; CTR = link clicks ÷ impressions. The headline "8× ROAS turnaround" is the blended purchase-ROAS recovery across the loss-making SKUs — from ≈0.3× to ≈2.8× across Twister and Chai Magic, stated conservatively. Blended cohort figures are spend- and impression-weighted across Elevate campaigns: ₹8.46L spend, ₹29.7L revenue, and 1,256 purchases.

Can Whilter deliver results like this for our brand?

Start with a Growth Assessment. We map your accounts, identify the highest-leverage problem, and show you what the connected engine would ship next. Explore more enterprise growth stories.